Back

Ultra-fast one-step RT-PCR protocol for the detection of SARS-CoV-2

Asghari, E.; Höving, A.; van Heijningen, P.; Kiel, A.; Kralemann-Köhler, A.; Lütkemeyer, M.; Storm, J.; Vollmer, T.; Knabbe, C.; Kaltschmidt, B.; de Vos, G.; Kaltschmidt, C.

2020-06-26 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.06.25.20137398 medRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in lockdowns all over the world thus affecting nearly all aspects of social life and also had a huge impact on global economies. Since vaccines and therapies are still not available for the population, prevention becomes desperately needed. One important aspect for prevention is the identification and subsequent isolation of contagious specimens. The currently used methods for diagnostics are time consuming and also hindered by the limited availability of reagents and reaction costs, thus presenting a bottle neck for prevention of COVID-19 spread. Here, we present a new ultra-fast test method which is ten times faster than conventional diagnostic tests using real time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). In addition, this ultra-fast method is easy to handle as well as cost effective. We translated published SARS-CoV-2 testing protocols from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) and the Charite Berlin (Germany) to the NEXTGENPCR (NGPCR) machine and combined it with a fluorescence-based endpoint measurement. Fluorescence was measured with a commercial blue light scanner. We confirmed the NEXTGENPCR results with commercially available positive controls. In addition, we isolated RNA from SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and achieved similar results to clinical RT-qPCR assays. Here, we could show correlation between the results obtained by NEXTGENPCR and conventional RT-qPCR.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
4
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
5
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
6
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
9
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
10
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.9%
11
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
23
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
28
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%