Back

Nanotrap(R) particles improve detection of SARS-CoV-2 for pooled sample methods, extraction-free saliva methods, and extraction-free medium methods

Barclay, R. A.; Akhrymuk, I.; Patnaik, A.; Callahan, V.; Lehman, C.; Andersen, P.; Barbero, R.; Barksdale, S.; Dunlap, R.; Goldfarb, D.; Jones-Roe, T.; Kelly, R.; Kim, B.; Miao, S.; Munns, A.; Munns, D.; Patel, S.; Porter, E.; Ramsey, R.; Sahoo, S.; Swahn, O.; Warsh, J.; Kehn-Hall, K.; Lepene, B.

2020-06-26 microbiology
10.1101/2020.06.25.172510 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Here we present a rapid and versatile method for capturing and concentrating SARS-CoV-2 from transport medium and saliva using affinity-capture magnetic hydrogel particles. We demonstrate that the method concentrates virus prior to RNA extraction, thus significantly improving detection of the virus using a real-time RT-PCR assay across a range of viral titers, from 100 to 1,000,000 viral copies/mL; in particular, detection of virus in low viral load samples is enhanced when using the method coupled with the IDT 2019-nCoV CDC EUA Kit. This method is compatible with commercially available nucleic acid extraction kits, as well with a simple heat and detergent method. Using transport medium diagnostic remnant samples that previously had been tested for SARS-CoV-2 using either the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 EUA Test (n=14) or the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 EUA Test (n=35), we demonstrate that our method not only correctly identifies all positive samples (n = 17) but also significantly improves detection of the virus in low viral load samples. The average improvement in cycle threshold (Ct) value as measured with the IDT 2019-nCoV CDC EUA Kit was 3.1; n = 10. Finally, to demonstrate that the method could potentially be used to enable pooled testing, we spiked infectious virus or a confirmed positive diagnostic remnant sample into 5 mL and 10 mL of negative transport medium and observed significant improvement in the detection of the virus from those larger sample volumes.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.5%
2
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
6
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
7
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
10
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
11
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
19
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
26
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%
29
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%