Back

Gazing into the Metaboverse: Automated exploration and contextualization of metabolic data

Berg, J. A.; Zhou, Y.; Waller, T. C.; Ouyang, Y.; Nowinski, S. M.; Van Ry, T.; George, I.; Cox, J. E.; Wang, B.; Rutter, J.

2020-09-28 biochemistry
10.1101/2020.06.25.171850 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Metabolism forms a complex, interdependent network, and perturbations can have indirect effects that are pervasive. Identifying these patterns and their consequences is difficult, particularly when the effects occur across canonical pathways, and these difficulties have long acted as a bottleneck in metabolic data analysis. This challenge is compounded by technical limitations in metabolomics approaches that garner incomplete datasets. Current network-based tools generally utilize pathway-level analysis lacking the granular resolution required to provide context into the effects of all perturbations, regardless of magnitude, across the metabolic network. To address these shortcomings, we introduce algorithms that allow for the real-time extraction of regulatory patterns and trends from user data. To minimize the impact of missing measurements within the metabolic network, we introduce methods that enable complex pattern recognition across multiple reactions. These tools are available interactively within the user-friendly Metaboverse app (https://github.com/Metaboverse) to facilitate exploration and hypothesis generation. We demonstrate that expected signatures are accurately captured by Metaboverse. Using public lung adenocarcinoma data, we identify a previously undescribed multi-dimensional signature that correlated with survival outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Using a model of respiratory deficiency, we identify relevant and previously unreported regulatory patterns that suggest an important compensatory role for citrate during mitochondrial dysfunction. This body of work thus demonstrates that Metaboverse can identify and decipher complex signals from data that have been otherwise difficult to identify with previous approaches.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.4%
3
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
5
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
8
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
9
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
10
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
13
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
14
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
18
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
19
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
23
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
26
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%