Back

A two-point IC50 method for evaluating the biochemical potency of irreversible enzyme inhibitors

Kuzmic, P.

2020-08-04 biochemistry
10.1101/2020.06.25.171207 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Irreversible (covalent) enzyme inhibitors cannot be unambiguously ranked for biochemical potency by using IC50 values determined at a single point in time, because the same IC50 value could originate either from relatively low initial binding affinity accompanied by high chemical reactivity, or the other way around. To disambiguate the potency ranking of covalent inhibitors, here we describe a data-analytic procedure relying on two separate IC50 values, determined at two different reaction times. In the case of covalent inhibitors following the two-step kinetic mechanism E + I {rightleftharpoons} E{middle dot}I [->] EI, the two IC50 values alone can be used to estimate both the inhibition constant (Ki) as a measure of binding affinity and the inactivation rate constant (kinact) as a measure of chemical reactivity. In the case of covalent inhibitors following the one-step kinetic mechanism E + I [->] EI, a simple algebraic formula can be used to estimate the covalent efficiency constant (kinact/Ki) from a single experimental value of IC50. The two simplifying assumptions underlying the method are (1) zero inhibitor depletion, which implies that the inhibitor concentrations are always significantly higher than the enzyme concentration; and (2) constant reaction rate in the uninhibited control assay. The newly proposed method is validated by using a simulation study involving 64 irreversible inhibitors with covalent efficiency constants spanning seven orders of magnitude.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.0%
5
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.8%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Protein Engineering, Design and Selection
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
20
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
22
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
23
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
26
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Metabolic Engineering Communications
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%