Back

Development of a finite element model to predict the cellular micromechanical environment in tissue engineering scaffolds

Page, M. I.; Linde, P. E.; Puttlitz, C.

2020-06-25 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.06.25.170597 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell fate in tissue engineering (TE) strategies is paramount to regenerate healthy, functional organs. The mechanical loads experienced by cells play an important role in cell fate. However, in TE scaffolds with a cell-laden hydrogel matrix, it is prohibitively complex to prescribe and measure this cellular micromechanical environment (CME). Accordingly, this study aimed to develop a finite element (FE) model of a TE scaffold unit cell that can be subsequently implemented to predict the CME and cell fates under prescribed loading. The compressible hyperelastic mechanics of a fibrin hydrogel were characterized by fitting unconfined compression and confined compression experimental data. This material model was implemented in a unit cell FE model of a TE scaffold. The FE mesh and boundary conditions were evaluated with respect to the mechanical response of a region of interest (ROI). A compressible second-order reduced polynomial hyperelastic model gave the best fit to the experimental data (C10 = 1.72×10-4, C20 = 3.83×10-4, D1 = 3.41, D2 = 8.06×10-2). A mesh with seed sizes of 40 μm and 60 μm in the ROI and non-ROI regions, respectively, yielded a converged model in 54 minutes. The in-plane boundary conditions demonstrated minimal influence on ROI mechanics for a 2-by-2 unit cell. However, the out-of-plane boundary conditions did exhibit an appreciable influence on ROI mechanics for a two bilayer unit cell. Overall, the developed unit cell model facilitates the modeling of the mechanical state of a cell-laden hydrogel within a TE scaffold under prescribed loading. This model will be utilized to characterize the CME in future studies, and 3D micromechanical criteria may be applied to predict cell fate in these scaffolds.View Full Text

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.2%
2
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
9
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
10
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.3%
14
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
16
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
20
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
29
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%