Back

A Multi-Task Pipeline with Specialized Streams forClassification and Segmentation of InfectionManifestations in COVID-19 Scans

El-bana, S.; Al-Kabbany, A.; Sharkas, M.

2020-06-26 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.06.24.20139238
Show abstract

We are concerned with the challenge of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) detection in chest X-ray and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, and the classification and segmentation of related infection manifestations. Even though it is arguably not an established diagnostic tool, using machine learning-based analysis of COVID-19 medical scans has shown the potential to provide a preliminary digital second opinion. This can help in managing the current pandemic, and thus has been attracting significant research attention. In this research, we propose a multi-task pipeline that takes advantage of the growing advances in deep neural network models. In the first stage, we fine-tuned an Inception-v3 deep model for COVID-19 recognition using multi-modal learning, i.e., using X-ray and CT scans. In addition to outperforming other deep models on the same task in the recent literature, with an attained accuracy of 99.4%, we also present comparative analysis for multi-modal learning against learning from X-ray scans alone. The second and the third stages of the proposed pipeline complement one another in dealing with different types of infection manifestations. The former features a convolutional neural network architecture for recognizing three types of manifestations, while the latter transfers learning from another knowledge domain, namely, pulmonary nodule segmentation in CT scans, to produce binary masks for segmenting the regions corresponding to these manifestations. Our proposed pipeline also features specialized streams in which multiple deep models are trained separately to segment specific types of infection manifestations, and we show the significant impact that this framework has on various performance metrics. We evaluate the proposed models on widely adopted datasets, and we demonstrate an increase of approximately 4% and 7% for dice coefficient and mean intersection-over-union (mIoU), respectively, while achieving 60% reduction in computational time, compared to the recent literature.

Matching journals

1
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 4%
3.1× avg
2
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
3
IEEE Access
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) · based on 11 published papers
#1
99× avg
4
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 57%
7.6%
5
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 10%
3.2× avg
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 39 published papers
Top 0.9%
20× avg
7
Scientific Data
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 30 published papers
Top 0.6%
19× avg
8
Patterns
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.8%
24× avg
9
Diagnostics
MDPI AG · based on 36 published papers
Top 2%
9.1× avg
10
PLOS Computational Biology
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 141 published papers
Top 7%
3.0× avg
11
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 37 published papers
Top 3%
6.3× avg
12
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 9%
2.4× avg
13
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
15× avg
14
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 22%
1.3%
15
Nature Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 88 published papers
Top 12%
2.4× avg
16
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) · based on 14 published papers
Top 3%
8.2× avg
17
eBioMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 82 published papers
Top 9%
2.8× avg
18
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 6%
3.3× avg
19
Communications Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 63 published papers
Top 5%
3.8× avg