Back

Barriers to Clinical Trial Efficiency and Patient Access: The Heart Failure Collaboratory Industry Survey

Sinha, S. S.; Psotka, M. A.; Fiuzat, M.; Barnett, S. D.; Bruckmann, M.; Butler, J.; DeSouza, M. M.; Felker, G. M.; Solomon, S. D.; Stockbridge, N.; Teerlink, J. R.; Unger, E. F.; O'Connor, C. M.; Konstam, M. A.

2020-06-29 health policy
10.1101/2020.06.24.20124917
Show abstract

AimsClinical trial inefficiency and lack of patient access to novel therapies have been identified as key barriers to successful heart failure innovation. The Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) is a consortium developed to identify and address barriers to bringing drugs and devices to market. The HFC performed an electronic cross-sectional survey of key leaders within industry to collate and interpret a sample of viewpoints on these challenges. Methods and ResultsFrom August to September 2018, self-administered survey data were electronically collected from industry partners. Group comparisons were made via Fishers Exact or chi-square test. Respondents most commonly rated the United States Food and Drug Administration (44.2%), Health Canada (39.5%) and European Medicines Agency (32.6%) as efficient. Respondents rated the top 3 areas with the greatest opportunity for regulatory agencies to improve efficiency: improve usefulness of agency feedback (48.8%); improved timeliness of agency responses (41.9%); and pre-specification of required magnitude of clinical effect and limit excessive data requirements (32.6%). Respondents rated items of excessive clinical site staff workload (55.8%), overly complex case report forms (51.2%) and data input errors (39.5%) as the top 3 factors influencing data quality. Respondents rated items of onerous prior authorization requirements (51.2%), availability of decision-making rationale (46.5%) and rationality of access barriers created by payers (44.2%) as the top 3 impediments to improving patient access to approved therapies. ConclusionThis broadly distributed survey of industry respondents identified multiple specific barriers to heart failure clinical trial efficiency and patient access, which should help direct efforts toward improvement.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 14%
22.2%
2
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 4%
17.4%
3
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
9.4%
4
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 2%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 3%
6.0%
6
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 54%
2.8%
7
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 1%
2.6%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 18%
1.5%
9
Journal of General Internal Medicine
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
10
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 5%
1.5%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 6%
1.5%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 7%
1.4%
13
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 15%
0.9%
15
BMJ Open Quality
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
16
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 20%
0.9%
17
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
19
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
20
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
based on 13 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
DIGITAL HEALTH
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 17%
0.8%
24
Clinical and Translational Science
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
BMC Health Services Research
based on 43 papers
Top 5%
0.8%