Back

Human brain function during pattern separation follows hippocampal and neocortical connectivity gradients

Li, Q.; Tavakol, S.; Royer, J.; Lariviere, S.; Vos de Wael, R.; Park, B.-y.; Paquola, C.; Caldairou, B.; Bassett, D. S.; Bernasconi, A.; Bernasconi, N.; Frauscher, B.; Smallwood, J.; Caciagli, L.; Li, S.; Bernhardt, B.

2020-06-26 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.06.22.165290 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWEpisodic memory is our ability to remember past events accurately. Pattern separation, the process of of orthogonalizing similar aspects of external information into nonoverlapping representations, is one of its mechanisms. Converging evidence suggests a pivotal role of the hippocampus, in concert with neocortical areas, in this process. The current study aimed to identify principal dimensions of functional activation associated with pattern separation in hippocampal and neocortical areas, in both healthy individuals and patients with lesions to the hippocampus. Administering a pattern separation fMRI paradigm to a group of healthy adults, we detected task-related activation in bilateral hippocampal and distributed neocortical areas. Capitalizing on manifold learning techniques applied to parallel resting-state fMRI data, we could identify that hippocampal and neocortical activity patterns were efficiently captured by their principal gradients of intrinsic functional connectivity, which follows the hippocampal long axis and sensory-fugal cortical organization. Functional activation patterns and their alignment with these principal dimensions were altered in patients. Notably, inter-individual differences in the concordance between task-related activity and intrinsic functional gradients were correlated with pattern separation performance in both patients and controls. Our work outlines a parsimonious approach to capture the functional underpinnings of episodic memory processes at the systems level, and to decode functional reorganization in clinical populations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.