Back

LATER but FORTIOR: diffusion modelling of inhibition of return

Seidel Malkinson, T.; Bourgeois, A.; Wattiez, N.; Pouget, P.; Bartolomeo, P.

2020-06-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.06.21.163485 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of response times (RTs) for stimuli repeated at previously inspected locations, as compared with novel ones. However, the exact processing stage(s) at which IOR occurs, and its nature across different response modalities, remain debated. We tested predictions on these issues originating from the FORTIOR model (fronto-parietal organization of response times in IOR; Seidel Malkinson & Bartolomeo, 2018), and from evidence accumulation models. We reanalysed RT data from a target-target IOR paradigm (Bourgeois et al.,2013a, 2013b) by using a LATER-like evidence accumulation model (Carpenter & Williams, 1995), to test the predictions of FORTIOR, and specifically whether IOR could occur at sensory/attentional stages of processing, or at stages of decision and action selection. We considered the following conditions: manual or saccadic response modality, before or after TMS perturbation over four cortical regions. Results showed that the Gaussian noise parameter best explained both manual and saccadic IOR, suggesting that in both response modalities IOR may result from slower accumulation of evidence for repeated locations. Additionally, across stimulated regions, TMS affected only manual RTs, lowering them equally in the conditions with repeated targets (Return) and non-repeated targets (Non-return). Accordingly, the modelling results show that TMS stimulation did not significantly alter the pattern between model parameters, with the Gaussian noise parameter remaining the parameter best explaining the Return - Non-return RT difference. Moreover, TMS over the right intra-parietal sulcus (IPS) perturbed IOR by shortening the Return RT. When directly testing this effect by modelling the TMS impact in the Return condition, the Bayesian information criterion of the Gaussian noise parameter was the smallest, but this effect did not reach significance. These results support the hypothesis that target-target IOR is a predominantly sensory/attentional phenomenon, and may be modulated by activity in fronto-parietal networks.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.7%
2
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
5
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.1%
7
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.2%
10
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
11
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
12
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.9%
13
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
14
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
17
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
18
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
23
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
28
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%
30
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%