Back

An implant for long-term cervical vagus nerve stimulation in mice

Mughrabi, I. T.; Hickman, J.; Jayaprakash, N.; Papadoyannis, E. S.; Abbas, A.; Chang, Y.-C.; Lee, S.; Datta-Chaudhuri, T.; Chang, E. H.; Zanos, T. P.; Froemke, R. C.; Welle, C.; Al-Abed, Y.; Zanos, S.

2020-06-20 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.06.20.160473 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulation therapy with the potential to treat a wide range of chronic conditions in which inflammation is implicated, including type 2 diabetes, obesity and atherosclerosis. Many of these diseases have well-established mouse models, but due to the significant surgical and engineering challenges that accompany a reliable interface for long-term VNS in mice, the therapeutic implications of this bioelectronic therapy remain unexplored. Here, we describe a long-term VNS implant in mice, developed at 3 research laboratories and validated for across-lab reproducibility. Implant functionality was evaluated over 3-8 weeks in 81 anesthetized or behaving mice by determining the stimulus intensity required to elicit a change in heart rate (heart rate threshold, HRT). HRT was also used as a method to standardize stimulation dosing. Overall, 60-90% of implants produced stimulus-evoked physiological responses for at least 4 weeks, with HRT values stabilizing after the second week of implantation. Furthermore, stimulation delivered through 6-week-old implants decreased TNF levels in a subset of mice with acute inflammation caused by endotoxemia. Histological examination of 4- to 6-week-old implants revealed fibrotic encapsulation and no gross fiber loss. This implantation and dosing approach provides a tool to systematically investigate the therapeutic potential of long-term VNS in chronic diseases modeled in the mouse, the most widely used vertebrate species in biomedical research.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.