Twitter activity about treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic: case studies of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and convalescent plasma.
Hamamsy, T. C.; Bonneau, R.
Show abstract
Since the COVID-19 pandemic started, the public has been eager for news about promising treatments, and social media has played a large role in information dissemination. In this paper, our objectives are to characterize the public discussion of treatments on Twitter, and demonstrate the utility of these discussions for public health surveillance. We pulled tweets related to three promising COVID-19 treatments (hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir and convalescent plasma), between the dates of February 28th and May 22nd using the Twitter public API. We characterize treatment tweet trends over this time period. Most major tweet/retweet/sentiment trends correlated to public announcement made by the white house and/or to new clinical trial evidence about treatments. Most of the websites people shared in treatment-related tweets were non-scientific media sources that leaned conservative. Hydroxychloroquine was the most discussed treatment on Twitter, and over 10% of hydroxychloroquine tweets mentioned an adverse drug reaction. There is a gap between the public attention/discussion around COVID-19 treatments and their evidence. Twitter data can and should be used for public health surveillance during this pandemic, as it is informative for monitoring adverse drug reactions, especially as many people avoid going to hospitals/doctors.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Users’ Reactions on Announced Vaccines against COVID-19 Before Marketing in France: Analysis of Twitter posts 93%
- Developing an automatic system for classifying chatter about health services from Twitter: A case study for Medicaid 92%
- Fear of Infection and Sufficient Vaccine Reservation Information Might Drive Rapid Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination in Japan: Evidence from Twitter Analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standardization of drug names in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: The DiAna dictionary 92%
- Patient-Reported Reasons for Antihypertensive Medication Change: A Quantitative Study Using Social Media 91%
- Large-scale empirical identification of candidate comparators for pharmacoepidemiological studies 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An interactive retrieval system for clinical trial studies with context-dependent protocol elements 91%
- Understanding mental health trends during COVID-19 pandemic in the United States using network analysis 90%
- Social media discourse and internet search queries on cannabis as a medicine: A systematic review 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.