Back

Short-lived plants have stronger demographic responses to climate

Compagnoni, A.; Levin, S.; Childs, D. Z.; Harpole, S.; Paniw, M.; Romer, G.; Burns, J. H.; Che-Castaldo, J.; Rueger, N.; Kunstler, G.; Bennett, J. M.; Archer, R.; Jones, O. R.; Salguero-Gomez, R.; Knight, T. M.

2020-06-20 ecology
10.1101/2020.06.18.160135 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To mitigate and adapt to climate change, there is an urgent need to synthesize the state of our knowledge on plant responses to climate. The availability of open-access data, combined with our understanding of plant physiology and life history theory provide opportunities to examine quantitative generalizations regarding which biomes and species are most responsive to climate drivers. Here, we synthesized time series of structured population models from 165 populations from 62 plants around the globe to link plant population growth rates to precipitation and temperature drivers. We expected: (1) more pronounced demographic responses to precipitation than temperature, especially in arid biomes; (2) a higher climate sensitivity in short-lived rather than long-lived species; and (3) a stronger response to climate by species that reproduce more frequently. We found that precipitation anomalies have a nearly three-fold larger effect on{lambda} than temperature. Precipitation has substantially more pronounced effects in more arid sites, but large noise makes this relationship non-significant. Species with shorter generation time have much stronger absolute responses to climate anomalies, while the degree of iteroparity does not correlate with population responses to climate. We conclude that key species-level traits can predict plant population responses to climate, and discuss the relevance of this generalization for conservation planning and evolutionary theory.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.2%
2
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
4
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.5%
5
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
7
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
8
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.0%
9
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
10
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
13
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
15
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.1%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.6%
23
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%