Back

Tau amyloidogenesis begins with a loss of its conformational polymorphism

Fernandez-Ramirez, M. d. C.; Hervas, R.; Menendez, M.; Laurents, D. V.; Carrion-Vazquez, M.

2020-06-20 biophysics
10.1101/2020.06.18.158923 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Knowledge on the molecular bases of early amyloid assembly is fundamental to understand its structure-dysfunction relationship during disease progression. Tauopathies, a well-defined set of neurodegenerative disorders that includes Alzheimers disease, are characterized by the pathological amyloid aggregation of tau. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms that trigger tau aggregation and toxicity are poorly understood. Here, using a single-molecule approach, AFM-based single molecule-force spectroscopy (AFM-SMFS), combined with a protein-engineering mechanical protection strategy, we have analyzed the fluctuations of the conformational space of tau during the start of its pathological amyloid assembly. Specifically, we have analyzed the region that includes the four tau microtubule-binding repeats, known to play a key role on tau aggregation. We find that, unlike other amyloid-forming proteins, tau aggregation is accompanied by a decrease of conformational polymorphism, which is driven by amyloid-promoting factors, such as the {Delta}280K and P301L mutations, linked to Frontotemporal Dementia-17, or by specific chemical conditions. Such perturbations have distinct effects and lead to different tau (aggregate) structures. In addition to providing insight into how tau aggregates in a context dependent manner, these findings may help delve into how protein aggregation-based diseases, like Alzheimers, might be treated using monomer fluctuations as a pharmacological target. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=157 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/158923v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (40K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@951f1borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2d5f5borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cf7776org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@abe671_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.