Back

Electrophysiological validation of premotor interneurons monosynaptically connected to the aCC motoneuron in the Drosophila larval CNS.

Giachello, C. N. G.; Zarin, A. A.; Kohsaka, H.; Fan, Y. N.; Nose, A.; Landgraf, M.; Baines, R. A.

2020-06-19 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.06.17.156430 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mapping the wired connectivity of a nervous system is a prerequisite for full understanding of function. In this respect, such endeavours can be likened to genome sequencing projects. These projects similarly produce impressive amounts of data which, whilst a technical tour-de-force, remain under-utilised without validation. Validation of neuron synaptic connectivity requires electrophysiology which has the necessary temporal and spatial resolution to map synaptic connectivity. However, this technique is not common and requires extensive equipment and training to master, particularly when applied to the small CNS of the Drosophila larva. Thus, validation of connectivity in this CNS has been more reliant on behavioural analyses and, in particular, activity imaging using the calcium-sensor GCaMP. Whilst both techniques are powerful, they each have significant limitations for this purpose. Here we use electrophysiology to validate an array of driver lines reported to label specific premotor interneurons that the Drosophila connectome project suggests are monosynaptically connected to an identified motoneuron termed the anterior corner cell (aCC). Our results validate this proposition for four selected lines. Thus, in addition to validating the connectome with respect to these four premotor interneurons, our study highlights the need to functionally validate driver lines prior to use.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
2
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
6
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
11
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Journal of Neurogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
23
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
25
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%