Hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin and in-hospital mortality or discharge in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection: a cohort study of 4,642 in-patients in France
Sbidian, E.; Josse, J.; Lemaitre, G.; Mayer, I.; Bernaux, M.; Gramfort, A.; Lapidus, N.; Paris, N.; Neuraz, A.; Lerner, I.; Garcelon, N.; Rance, B.; Grisel, O.; Moreau, T.; Bellamine, A.; Wolkenstein, P.; Varoquaux, G.; Caumes, E.; Lavielle, M.; Mekontso Dessap, A.; Audureau, E.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo assess the clinical effectiveness of oral hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with or without azithromycin (AZI) in preventing death or leading to hospital discharge. DesignRetrospective cohort study. SettingAn analysis of data from electronic medical records and administrative claim data from the French Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP) data warehouse, in 39 public hospitals, Ile-de-France, France. ParticipantsAll adult inpatients with at least one PCR-documented SARS-CoV-2 RNA from a nasopharyngeal sample between February 1st, 2020 and April 6th, 2020 were eligible for analysis. The study population was restricted to patients who did not receive COVID-19 treatments assessed in ongoing trials, including antivirals and immunosuppressive drugs. End of follow-up was defined as the date of death, discharge home, day 28 after admission, whichever occurred first, or administrative censoring on May 4, 2020. InterventionPatients were further classified into 3 groups: (i) receiving HCQ alone, (ii) receiving HCQ together with AZI, and (iii) receiving neither HCQ nor AZI. Exposure to a HCQ/AZI combination was defined as a simultaneous prescription of the 2 treatments (more or less one day). Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was all-cause 28-day mortality as a time-to-event endpoint under a competing risks survival analysis framework. The secondary outcome was 28-day discharge home. Augmented inverse probability of treatment weighted (AIPTW) estimates of the average treatment effect (ATE) were computed to account for confounding. ResultsA total of 4,642 patients (mean age: 66.1 {+/-} 18; males: 2,738 (59%)) were included, of whom 623 (13.4%) received HCQ alone, 227 (5.9%) received HCQ plus AZI, and 3,792 (81.7%) neither drug. Patients receiving HCQ alone or HCQ plus AZI were more likely younger, males, current smokers and overall presented with slightly more co-morbidities (obesity, diabetes, any chronic pulmonary diseases, liver diseases), while no major difference was apparent in biological parameters. After accounting for confounding, no statistically significant difference was observed between the HCQ and Neither drug groups for 28-day mortality: AIPTW absolute difference in ATE was +1.24% (-5.63 to 8.12), ratio in ATE 1.05 (0.77 to 1.33). 28-day discharge rates were statistically significantly higher in the HCQ group: AIPTW absolute difference in ATE (+11.1% [3.30 to 18.9]), ratio in ATE (1.25 [1.07 to 1.42]). As for the HCQ+AZI vs neither drug, trends for significant differences and ratios in AIPTW ATE were found suggesting higher mortality rates in the former group (difference in ATE +9.83% [-0.51 to 20.17], ratio in ATE 1.40 [0.98 to 1.81];p=0.062). ConclusionsUsing a large non-selected population of inpatients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection in 39 hospitals in France and robust methodological approaches, we found no evidence for efficacy of HCQ or HCQ combined with AZI on 28-day mortality. Our results suggested a possible excess risk of mortality associated with HCQ combined with AZI, but not with HCQ alone. Significantly higher rates of discharge home were observed in patients treated by HCQ, a novel finding warranting further confirmation in replicative studies. Altogether, our findings further support the need to complete currently undergoing randomized clinical trials. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS?O_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this subjectC_ST_ABS- The use of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or HCQ with azithromycin (AZI) has been associated with viral load reduction at 6 days in COVID-19 infected patients - No difference between HCQ and no-HCQ groups in terms of risk of death or need for mechanical ventilation was found in two large cohorts of hospitalized COVID-19 infected patients What this study adds- Using a large non-selected population of inpatients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection in 39 hospitals in France and robust methodological approaches, we found no evidence for efficacy of HCQ on 28-day mortality - Our results suggest an excess risk of mortality in patients treated by a combination of HCQ and AZI, but not with HCQ alone - Significantly higher rates of discharge home were observed in patients treated by HCQ, a novel finding warranting further confirmation in replicative studies
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 95%
- Detailed disease progression of 213 patients hospitalized with Covid-19 in the Czech Republic: An exploratory analysis 94%
- Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab′)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: a retrospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dexamethasone use and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: a Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study 91%
- Medication Clusters at Hospital Discharge and Risk of Adverse Drug Events at 30-days Post-Discharge: A Population-based Cohort Study of Older Adults 91%
- People exposed to proton pump inhibitors shortly preceding COVID-19 diagnosis are not at an increased risk of subsequent hospitalizations and mortality: a nation-wide matched cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Echinacea purpurea for the Long-term Prevention of Viral Respiratory Tract Infections during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized, Open, Controlled, Exploratory Clinical Study 92%
- Assessment of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine Safety Profiles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 90%
- Favipiravir versus Arbidol for COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin plus Colchicine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir and a combination of them in Hospitalized Patients with SARS Covid-19 94%
- Serious hospital events following symptomatic infection with Sars-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants: an exposed-unexposed cohort study in December 2021 from the COVID-19 surveillance databases in France 91%
- The angiotensin type 2 receptor agonist C21 restores respiratory function in COVID19 - a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and performance of a population-based risk stratification model for COVID-19 92%
- Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes among shielded and non-shielded populations: A general population cohort study of 1.3 million 91%
- Hydroxychloroquine plus standard care compared with the standard care alone in COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.