Back

An interpretable mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients - alternative approach

Gemmar, P.

2020-06-22 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.06.14.20130732 medRxiv
Show abstract

The pandemic spread of coronavirus leads to increased burden on healthcare services worldwide. Experience shows that required medical treatment can reach limits at local clinics and fast and secure clinical assessment of the disease severity becomes vital. In [1] a model is presented for predicting the mortality of COVID-19 patients from their biomarkers. Three biomarkers have been selected by ranking with a supervised Multi-tree XGBoost classifier. The prediction model is built up as a binary decision tree with depth three and achieves AUC scores of up to 97.84{+/-}0.37 and 95.06{+/-} 2.21 for training and external test data sets, resp. In human assessment and decision making influencing parameters usually arent considered as sharp numbers but rather as Fuzzy terms [2], and inferencing primarily yields Fuzzy terms or continuous grades rather than binary decisions. Therefore, I examined a Sugenotype Fuzzy classifier [3] for disease assessment and decision support. In addition, I used an artificial neural network (SOM, [4]) for selecting the biomarkers. Modelling and validation was done with the identical data base provided by [1]. With the complete training and test data sets, the Fuzzy prediction model achieves improved AUC scores of up to 98.59 or 95.12 The improvements with the Fuzzy classifier obviously become clear as physicians can interpret output grades to belong to positive or negative class more or less strongly. An extension of the Fuzzy model, which takes into account the trend in key features over time, provides excellent results with the training data, which, however, could not be finally verified due to the lack of suitable test data. The generation and training of the Fuzzy models was fully automatic and without additional adjustment with the help of ANFIS from Matlab(C).

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
2
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
4
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
5
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
13
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
20
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
28
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%