Back

Integrated analysis of high throughput transcriptomic data revealed specific gene expression signature of cardiomyocytes

Omrani, M. R.; Sharifi, E.; Khazaei, N.; Jahangiri Esfahani, S.; Kieran, N. W.; Hashemi, H.; Mohammadnia, A.; Yaqubi, M.

2020-06-15 cell biology
10.1101/2020.06.14.151399 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Acquiring a specific transcriptomic signature of the human and mouse cardiomyocyte (CM) will greatly increase our understanding of their biology and associated diseases that remain the most deadly across the world. In this study, using comprehensive transcriptomic mining of 91 cell types over 877 samples from bulk RNA-sequencing, single cell RNA-sequencing, and microarray techniques, we describe a unique 118-gene signature of human and mouse primary CMs. Once we had access to this CM-specific gene signature, we investigated the spatial heterogeneity of CMs throughout the heart tissue. Moreover, we compared the CM-specific gene signature to that of CMs derived from 10 differentiation protocols, and we identified the protocols that generate cells most similar to primary CMs. Finally, we looked at the specific differences between primary and differentiated CMs and found that differentiated cells underexpress genes related to CM development and maturity. The differentiated cells conversely overexpressed cell cycle-related genes, resulting in the progenitor features that remain in differentiated CMs compared to primary adult CMs. The presence of histone post translational modification H3K27ac from ChIP sequencing data sets were used to confirm transcriptomic findings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive study to date that unravels the unique transcriptomic signature of primary and differentiated CMs. This study provides important insights into our understanding of CM biology and the molecular mechanisms that make them such a unique cell type. Moreover, the specific transcriptomic signature of CMs could be used in developmental studies, stem cell therapy, regenerative medicine, and drug screening assays.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.8%
2
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.6%
3
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
5
Journal of Molecular Cell Biology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.2%
11
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
19
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Journal of Cellular Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Neuroscience Bulletin
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
25
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
European Journal of Pharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%