The adaptive function of sexual reproduction: a lottery analogy.
Hickey, D. A.; Golding, G. B.
Show abstract
Recombination allows a finite population to resample the genotype pool, i.e., the universe of all possible genotypic combinations. This is important in populations that contain abundant genetic variation because, in such populations, the number of potential genotypes is much larger than the number of individuals in the population. Here, we show how recombination, in combination with natural selection, enables an evolving sexual population to replace existing genotypes with new, higher-fitness genotypic combinations. In contrast to this, an asexual population is limited to selection among existing genotypes. Since it has been shown that most eukaryotic species are genetically polymorphic, our model can explain the ubiquity of sex among such species. The model also indicates that classic population genetics theory is applicable to ecological studies of natural selection acting on standing genetic variation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hoisted with his own petard: how sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila affinis creates resistance alleles that limit its spread 96%
- Evolution of individual variation in a competitive trait: a theoretical analysis 96%
- Hidden genetic variance contributes to increase the short-term adaptive potential of selfing populations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of the mutation load on the genomic composition of hybrids between outcrossing and self-fertilizing species 97%
- Adaptive peak tracking as explanation of sparse fossil data across fluctuating ancient environments 95%
- Dynamical BLUP modeling of mean reaction norm evolution, accommodating changing environments, overlapping generations, and multivariate data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.