Galaxy-SynBioCAD: Synthetic Biology Design Automation tools in Galaxy workflows
du Lac, M.; Duigou, T.; Herisson, J.; Carbonell, P.; Swainston, N.; Zulkower, V.; Shah, F.; Faure, L.; Mahdy, M.; Soudier, P.; Faulon, J.-L.
Show abstract
Many computer-aided design tools are available for synthetic biology and metabolic engineering. Yet, these tools can be difficult to apprehend, sometimes requiring a level of expertise that limits their use by a wider community. Furthermore, some of the tools, although complementary, rely on different input and output formats and cannot communicate with one another. Scientific workflows address these shortcomings while offering a novel design strategy. Among the workflow systems available, Galaxy is a web-based platform for performing findable and accessible data analyses for all scientists regardless of their informatics expertise, along with interoperable and reproducible computations regardless of the particular platform that is being used. Here, we introduce the Galaxy-SynBioCADa portal, the first Galaxy toolshed for synthetic biology and metabolic engineering. It allows one to easily create workflows or use those already developed by the community. The portal is a growing community effort where developers can add new tools and users can evaluate the tools performing design for their specific projects. The tools and workflows currently shared on the Galaxy-SynBioCAD portal cover an end-to-end metabolic pathway design process from the selection of strain and target to the calculation of DNA parts to be assembled to build libraries of strains to be engineered to produce the target. Standard formats are used throughout to enforce the compatibility of the tools. These include SBML for strain and pathway and SBOL for genetic layouts. The portal has been benchmarked on 81 literature pathways, overall, we find we have a 65% (and 88%) success rate in retrieving the literature pathways among the top 10 (50) pathways predicted and generated by the workflows.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- XomicsToModel: Multiomics data integration and generation of thermodynamically consistent metabolic models 94%
- Inferring cellular and molecular processes in single-cell data with non-negative matrix factorization using Python, R, and GenePattern Notebook implementations of CoGAPS 94%
- OCTAD: an open workplace for virtually screening therapeutics targeting precise cancer patient groups using gene expression features 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Galaxy-SynBioCAD: Automated Pipeline for Synthetic Biology Design and Engineering 98%
- Designing pathways for bioproducing complex chemicals by combining tools for pathway extraction and ranking 95%
- A genome-scale metabolic model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that integrates expression constraints and reaction thermodynamics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Domainator, a flexible software suite for domain-based annotation and neighborhood analysis, identifies proteins involved in antiviral systems 93%
- The ModelSEED Database for the integration of metabolic annotations and the reconstruction, comparison, and analysis of metabolic models for plants, fungi, and microbes 93%
- Datanator: an integrated database of molecular data for quantitatively modeling cellular behavior 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- StreptoCAD: An open-source software toolbox automating genome engineering workflows in streptomycetes 94%
- OptDesign: Identifying Optimum Design Strategies in Strain Engineering for Biochemical Production 94%
- Data-Driven Strain Design Using Aggregated Adaptive Laboratory Evolution Mutational Data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- BioCRNpyler: Compiling Chemical Reaction Networks from Biomolecular Parts in Diverse Contexts 94%
- FUN-PROSE: A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Condition-Specific Gene Expression in Fungi 93%
- A pipeline for the reconstruction and evaluation of context-specific human metabolic models at a large-scale 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.