COVID-19: a crash test for biomedical publishing?
Iourov, I. Y.; Zelenova, M. A.; Vorsanova, S. G.
Show abstract
The effect of COVID-19 on biomedical publishing (BP) (i.e. scientific biomedical periodicals continuously published by research communities or commercial publishers) has not been deeply explored. To estimate the immediate COVID-19 impact on BP, we have assessed PubMed-indexed articles about COVID-19 (PMIAC) from December 2019 to April 2020. PMIAC have been classified according to publication date, country, and journals for evaluation of time-, region- and scientometric-dependant impact of COVID-19 on BP and have been curated manually (i.e. each entry has been individually analyzed). PMIAC analysis reflects geographic and temporal parameters of outbreak spread. A major BP problem is related to the fact that only 40% of articles report/review/analyze data. Another BP weakness is the clusterization of "highly-trusted" publications according to countries of origin and "highly impacting" journals. Finally, a problem highlighted by COVID-19 crisis is the increased specification of biomedical research. To solve the problem, analytical reviews integrating data from different areas of biology and medicine are required. The data on PMIAC suggest priority of "what is published" over "where it is published" and "who are the authors". We believe that our brief analysis may help to shape forthcoming BP to become more effective in solving immediate problems resulted from global threats.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals 93%
- Mapping the coevolution, leadership and financing of research on viral vectors, RNAi, CRSPR/Cas9 and other genomic editing technologies 93%
- Controlled experiment finds no detectable citation bump from Twitter promotion 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 89%
- Privacy Protection of Sexually Transmitted Infections Information from Chinese Electronic Medical Records 89%
- A natural language processing system for the efficient extraction of cell markers 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of exogenous oxytocin on human brain function are regulated by oxytocin gene expression: a meta-analysis of 20 years of oxytocin neuroimaging and transcriptomic analyses 84%
- The central autonomic system revisited - convergent evidence for a regulatory role of the insular and midcingulate cortex from neuroimaging meta-analyses 83%
- The neuroprotective effects of estrogen and estrogenic compounds in spinal cord injury 82%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.