Back
Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 viral copy number in saliva mouthwash samples using digital droplet PCR
Oberding, L.; Hu, J.; Berenger, B.; Mohon, A. N.; Pillai, D. R.
2020-06-16
infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.06.13.20130237
medRxiv
Show abstract
Saliva samples were collected through a simple mouth wash procedure and viral load quantified using a technology called digital droplet PCR. Data suggest ddPCR allows for precise quantification of viral load in clinical samples infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Matching journals
●Non-profit
◐University press
○Commercial
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
1
PLOS ONE
●
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.0%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid processing of SARS-CoV-2 containing specimens for direct RT-PCR 95%
- Development and Implementation of a Simple and Rapid Extraction-Free Saliva SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP Workflow for Workplace Surveillance 95%
- Evaluation of GENECUBE ® HQ SARS-CoV-2 for anterior nasal samples and saliva samples with a new rapid examination protocol 94%
2
Scientific Reports
○
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.9%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance evaluation of a non-invasive one-step multiplex RT-qPCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 direct from human saliva 94%
- Validation of a rapid, saliva-based, and ultra-sensitive SARS-CoV-2 screening system for a pandemic-scale infection surveillance 94%
- A simple RNA preparation method for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR 94%
3
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
○
129 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation and implementation of a direct RT-qPCR method for rapid screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection by using non-invasive saliva samples 94%
- Self-collected oral, nasal and saliva samples yield sensitivity comparable to professional-collected oro-nasopharyngeal swabs in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis 93%
- Efficacy of a novel SARS-CoV-2 detection kit without RNA extraction and purification 92%
4
Journal of Medical Virology
○
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
- Saliva as a potential clinical specimen for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 94%
- Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection in Saliva by real-time RT-PCR and RT-PCR/MALDI-TOF Methods 92%
- Real-life performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis: a prospective study 92%
5
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
◐
202 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal assessment of diagnostic test performance over the course of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection 93%
- Reliability of self-sampling for accurate assessment of respiratory virus viral and immunologic kinetics 92%
- Persisting Salivary IgG against SARS-CoV-2 at 9 Months After Mild COVID-19: A Complementary Approach to Population Surveys 92%
50% of probability mass above
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.