Back

CDC6 regulates mitotic CDK1 via cyclin B and not cyclin A and acts through a bona fide CDK inhibitor Xic1

Kubiak, J. Z.; El Dika, M.; Wechselberger, L.; Djeghout, B.; Benouareth, D. E.; Jederka, K.; Lewicki, S.; Prigent, C.; Kloc, M.

2020-06-13 cell biology
10.1101/2020.06.13.149989 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The timing of the M-phase entry and its progression are precisely controlled by a CDC6-dependent mechanism that inhibits the major mitotic kinase CDK1, and, thus, regulates the dynamic of CDK1 during the M-phase. In this paper, we describe the differential regulation of the mitotic CDK1 dynamics by exogenous cyclin A or a non-degradable cyclin B added to the Xenopus laevis embryo cycling extracts. We showed that the variations in the level of cyclin B modify both CDK1 activity and the timing of the M-phase progression, while the cyclin A levels modify only CDK1 activity without changing the timing of the M-phase events. In consequence, CDC6 regulates the M-phase through endogenous cyclin B, but not cyclin A, which we demonstrated directly by the depletion of cyclin A, and the addition of CDC6 to the cycling extracts. Further, we showed, by p9 precipitation (p9 protein associates with Cyclin-Dependent Kinases, CDK), followed by the Western blotting that CDC6, and the bona fide CDK1 inhibitor Xic1, associate with CDK1 and/or another CDK present in Xenopus embryos, the CDK2. Finally, we demonstrated that the Xic1 temoprarily separates from the mitotic CDK complexes during the peak of CDK1 activity. These data show the differential coordination of the M-phase progression by CDK1/cyclin A and CDK1/cyclin B, confirm the critical role of the CDC6-dependent CDK1 inhibition in this process and show that CDC6 acts through the cyclin B- and not cyclin A/CDK complexes. This CDC6- and cyclin B-dependent mechanism may also depend on the precisely regulated association of Xic1 with the CDK complexes. We postulate that the dissociation of Xic1 from the CDK complexes allows the maximal activation of CDK1 during the M-phase.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.2%
4
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
5
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell Cycle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
9
Experimental Cell Research
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
11
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
17
Genes to Cells
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Biology of the Cell
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%