Direct RNA sequencing reveals structural differences between transcript isoforms
Aw, A. J. G.; Lim, S.; Wang, J. X.; Shen, Y.; Kaewsapsak, P.; Kok, E. P. L.; Li, C.; Ng, B. H.; Vardy, L. A.; Tan, M. H.; Nagarajan, N.; Wan, Y.
Show abstract
The ability to correctly assign structure information to an individual transcript in a continuous and phased manner is critical to understanding RNA function. RNA structure play important roles in every step of an RNAs lifecycle, however current short-read high throughput RNA structure mapping strategies are long, complex and cannot assign unique structures to individual gene-linked isoforms in shared sequences. To address these limitations, we present an approach that combines structure probing with SHAPE-like compound NAI-N3, nanopore direct RNA sequencing, and one-class support vector machines to detect secondary structures on near full-length RNAs (PORE-cupine). PORE-cupine provides rapid, direct, accurate and robust structure information along known RNAs and recapitulates global structural features in human embryonic stem cells. The majority of gene-linked isoforms showed structural differences in shared sequences both local and distal to the alternative splice site, highlighting the importance of long-read sequencing for phasing of structures. Structural differences between gene-linked isoforms are associated with differential translation efficiencies globally, highlighting the role of structure as a pervasive mechanism for regulating isoform-specific gene expression inside cells.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Profiling RNA at chromatin targets in situ by antibody-targeted tagmentation 97%
- Nano3P-seq: transcriptome-wide analysis of gene expression and tail dynamics using end-capture nanopore cDNA sequencing 97%
- A systematic benchmark of Nanopore long read RNA sequencing for transcript level analysis in human cell lines 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.