Back

Biased agonists of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 differentially drive formation of Gαi:β-arrestin complexes

Zheng, K. Z.; Smith, J. S.; Warman, A.; Choi, I.; Gundry, J.; Pack, T. F.; Inoue, A.; Caron, M.; Rajagopal, S.

2020-06-12 biochemistry
10.1101/2020.06.11.146605 bioRxiv
Show abstract

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest family of cell surface receptors, signal through the proximal effectors G proteins and {beta}-arrestins to influence nearly every biological process. Classically, the G protein and {beta}-arrestin signaling pathways have largely been considered separable. Recently, direct interactions between G protein and {beta}-arrestin have been described and suggest a distinct GPCR signaling pathway. Within these newly described G:{beta}-arrestin complexes, Gi/o, but not other G protein subtypes, have been appreciated to directly interact with {beta}-arrestin, regardless of canonical GPCR G protein subtype coupling. However it is unclear how biased agonists differentially regulate this newly described Gi:{beta}-arrestin interaction, if at all. Here we report that endogenous ligands (chemokines) of the GPCR CXCR3, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, along with two small molecule biased CXCR3 agonists, differentially promote the formation of Gi:{beta}-arrestin complexes. The ability of CXCR3 agonists to form Gi:{beta}-arrestin complexes does not correlate well with either G protein signaling or {beta}-arrestin recruitment. Conformational biosensors demonstrate that ligands that promoted Gi:{beta}-arrestin complex formation generated similar {beta}-arrestin conformations. We find these Gi:{beta}-arrestin complexes can associate with CXCR3, but not with ERK. These findings further support that Gi:{beta}-arrestin complex formation is a distinct GPCR signaling pathway and enhance our understanding of biased agonism.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
19.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.9%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 11%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.7%
6
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
8
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
9
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.5%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
11
Science Signaling
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Molecular Pharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
15
Biochemical Journal
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
19
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Cellular Signalling
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
22
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
27
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%