Back

Validation and performance of a quantitative IgG assay for the screening of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies

Espino, A. M.; Pantoja, P.; Sariol, C. A.

2020-06-12 microbiology
10.1101/2020.06.11.146332 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The current COVID-19 epidemic imposed an unpreceded challenge to the scientific community in terms of treatment, epidemiology, diagnosis, social interaction, fiscal policies and many other areas. The development of accurate and reliable diagnostic tools (high specificity and sensitivity) is crucial in the current period, the near future and in the long term. These assays should provide guidance to identify immune presumptive protected persons, potential plasma, and/or B cell donors and vaccine development among others. Also, such assays will be contributory in supporting prospective and retrospective studies to identify the prevalence and incidence of COVID-19 and to characterize the dynamics of the immune response. As of today, only thirteen serological assays have received the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA). In this work we describe the development and validation of a quantitative IgG enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) using the recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein S1 domain, containing the receptor-binding domain (RBD), showing 98% sensitivity, 98.9% specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 99.2%, respectively. The assay showed to be useful to test for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in plasma samples from COVID-19-recovered subjects as potential donors for plasmapheresis. This assay is currently under review by the Federal Drug Administration for an Emergency Use Authorization request (Submission Number EUA201115).

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
4
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
5
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
8
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
9
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
14
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
22
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
29
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%