Back

Causes and consequences of child growth failure in low- and middle-income countries

Mertens, A.; Benjamin-Chung, J.; Colford, J. M.; Coyle, J.; van der Laan, M.; Hubbard, A. E.; Dayal, S.; Malenica, I.; Hejazi, N.; Sofrygin, O.; Cai, W.; Li, H.; Nguyen, A.; Pokpongkiat, N. N.; Djajadi, S.; Seth, A.; Chung, E. O.; Jilek, W.; Subramoney, V.; Hafen, R.; Haggstrom, J.; Norman, T.; Brown, K. H.; Christian, P.; Arnold, B. F.; ki Child Growth Consortium,

2020-06-11 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.06.09.20127100 medRxiv
Show abstract

Growth faltering (low length-for-age or weight-for-length) in the first 1000 days -- from conception to two years of age -- influences short and long-term health and survival. Interventions such as nutritional supplementation during pregnancy and the postnatal period could help prevent growth faltering, but programmatic action has been insufficient to eliminate the high burden of stunting and wasting in low- and middle-income countries. Future preventive efforts will benefit from understanding age-windows and population subgroups in which to focus. Here, we use a population intervention effects analysis of 33 longitudinal cohorts (83,671 children, 662,763 measurements) and 30 separate exposures to show that improving maternal anthropometry and child condition at birth accounted for population increases in length-for-age Z of up to 0.40 and weight-for-length Z of up to 0.15 by age 24 months. Boys had consistently higher risk of all forms of growth faltering than girls. Early post-natal growth faltering predisposed children to subsequent and persistent growth faltering. Children with multiple growth deficits had higher mortality rates from birth to two years than those without deficits (hazard ratios 1.9 to 8.7). The importance of prenatal causes, and severe consequences for children who experienced early growth faltering, support a focus on pre-conception and pregnancy as key opportunities for new preventive interventions.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.