Back

Temporal refuges differ between anthropogenic and natural top down pressures in a subordinate carnivore

Malhotra, R.; Lima, S.; Harris, N. C.

2020-06-10 ecology
10.1101/2020.06.09.143222 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Apex predators structure communities through consumptive and non-consumptive pathways. In the carnivore guild, this can result in a within-guild cascade through the suppression of mesocarnivores. As the top-down influences of apex predators wane due to human-driven declines, landscape level anthropogenic pressures are rising. Human impacts can be analogous to apex predators in that humans can drive increased mortality in both prey species and carnivores, and impact communities through indirect fear effects and food subsidies. Here, we evaluate whether anthropogenic top-down pressures can structure communities in a similar manner as apex predators in shaping the interactions of mesocarnivores. Specifically, we expect anthropogenic forces to induce comparable effects as occurrence of apex predators in driving spatiotemporal partitioning between two mesocarnivores. Using multiple camera-trap surveys, we compared the temporal response of a small carnivore, the raccoon (Procyon lotor), to the larger coyote (Canis latrans) at four sites across Michigan that represented opposing gradients of pressure from humans and apex predators. Contrary to our expectations, we found that raccoons shifted their activity pattern in response to coyotes at sites with higher anthropogenic pressures and exhibited no temporal response at sites with apex predators. Temporal shifts were characterized by raccoons being more diurnal in areas of high coyote activity. We conclude that despite superficial similarities, anthropogenic forces do not replace the function of native apex predators in structuring the mesocarnivore guild. As such, an intact and functioning native predator guild remains necessary to preserve spatiotemporal community structure, in natural and disturbed systems alike.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
4
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
8
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
12
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
16
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
17
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
20
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
21
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%