Back

Extensive transfer of genes for edible seaweed digestion from marine to human gut bacteria

Pudlo, N. A.; Vasconcelos Pereira, G.; Parnami, J.; Cid, M.; Markert, S.; Tingley, J. P.; Unfried, F.; Ali, A.; Campbell, A.; Urs, K.; Xiao, Y.; Adams, R.; Martin, D.; Bolam, D. N.; Becher, D.; Schmidt, T. M.; Abbott, W.; Schweder, T.; Hehemann, J. H.; Martens, E. C.

2020-06-10 microbiology
10.1101/2020.06.09.142968 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans harbor numerous species of colonic bacteria that digest the fiber polysaccharides in commonly consumed terrestrial plants. More recently in history, regional populations have consumed edible macroalgae seaweeds containing unique polysaccharides. It remains unclear how extensively gut bacteria have adapted to digest these nutrients and use these abilities to colonize microbiomes around the world, especially outside Asia. Here, we show that the ability of gut bacteria to digest seaweed polysaccharides is more pervasive than previously appreciated. Using culture-based approaches, we show that known Bacteroides genes involved in seaweed degradation have mobilized into many members of this genus. We also identify several previously unknown examples of marine bacteria-derived genes, and their corresponding mobile DNA elements, that are involved in degrading seaweed polysaccharides. Some of these genes reside in gut-resident, Gram-positive Firmicutes, for which phylogenetic analysis suggests an origin in the Epulopiscium gut symbionts of marine fishes. Our results are important for understanding the metabolic plasticity of the human gut microbiome, the global exchange of genes in the context of dietary selective pressures and identifying new functions that can be introduced or engineered to design and fill orthogonal niches for a future generation of engineered probiotics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.