Back

GSTU7 affects growth performance and acts as an antagonist of oxidative stress induced by methyl viologen

Ugalde, J. M.; Lamig, L.; Herrera-Vasquez, A.; Fuchs, P.; Müller-Schüssele, S. J.; Meyer, A. J.; Holuigue, L.

2020-06-12 plant biology
10.1101/2020.06.09.142729 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plant glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are glutathione-dependent enzymes with versatile functions, mainly related to detoxification of electrophilic xenobiotics and peroxides. The Arabidopsis genome codes for 53 GSTs, divided into seven subclasses, however understanding of their precise functions is limited. A recent study showed that class II TGA transcription factors TGA2, TGA5 and TGA6 are essential for tolerance of UV-B-induced oxidative stress and that this tolerance is associated with an antioxidative function of cytosolic tau-class GSTUs. Specifically, TGA2 controls the expression of several GSTUs under UV-B light and constitutive expression of GSTU7 in the tga256 triple mutant is sufficient to revert the UV-B-susceptible phenotype of tga256. To further study the function of GSTU7, we characterized its role in mitigation of oxidative damage caused by the herbicide methyl viologen (MV). Under non-stress conditions, gstu7 null mutants were smaller than wild-type (WT) plants and delayed in the onset of the MV-induced antioxidative response, which led to accumulation of hydrogen peroxide and diminished seedling survival. Complementation of gstu7 by constitutively expressed GSTU7 rescued these phenotypes. Furthermore, live monitoring of the glutathione redox potential in intact cells with the fluorescent probe Grx1-roGFP2 revealed that GSTU7 overexpression completely abolished the MV-induced oxidation of the cytosolic glutathione buffer compared to WT plants. GSTU7 was found to act as a glutathione peroxidase able to complement the lack of peroxidase-type GSTs in yeast. Together, these findings show that GSTU7 is crucial in the antioxidative response by limiting oxidative damage and thus protecting cells from oxidative stress.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
2
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.1%
3
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
4
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
5
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
10
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
15
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.4%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
18
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.2%
20
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%