Benchmarking Deep Learning Models and Automated Model Design for COVID-19 Detection with Chest CT Scans
He, X.; Wang, S.; Shi, S.; Chu, X.; Tang, J.; Liu, X.; Yan, C.; Zhang, J.; Ding, G.
Show abstract
COVID-19 pandemic has spread all over the world for months. As its transmissibility and high pathogenicity seriously threaten peoples lives, the accurate and fast detection of the COVID-19 infection is crucial. Although many recent studies have shown that deep learning based solutions can help detect COVID-19 based on chest CT scans, there lacks a consistent and systematic comparison and evaluation on these techniques. In this paper, we first build a clean and segmented CT dataset called Clean-CC-CCII by fixing the errors and removing some noises in a large CT scan dataset CC-CCII with three classes: novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP), common pneumonia (CP), and normal controls (Normal). After cleaning, our dataset consists of a total of 340,190 slices of 3,993 scans from 2,698 patients. Then we benchmark and compare the performance of a series of state-of-the-art (SOTA) 3D and 2D convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The results show that 3D CNNs outperform 2D CNNs in general. With extensive effort of hyperparameter tuning, we find that the 3D CNN model DenseNet3D121 achieves the highest accuracy of 88.63% (F1-score is 88.14% and AUC is 0.940), and another 3D CNN model ResNet3D34 achieves the best AUC of 0.959 (accuracy is 87.83% and F1-score is 86.04%). We further demonstrate that the mixup data augmentation technique can largely improve the model performance. At last, we design an automated deep learning methodology to generate a lightweight deep learning model MNas3DNet41 that achieves an accuracy of 87.14%, F1-score of 87.25%, and AUC of 0.957, which are on par with the best models made by AI experts. The automated deep learning design is a promising methodology that can help health-care professionals develop effective deep learning models using their private data sets. Our Clean-CC-CCII dataset and source code are available at: https://github.com/HKBU-HPML/HKBU_HPML_COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- BertNDA: a Model Based on Graph-Bert and Multi-scale Information Fusion for ncRNA-disease Association Prediction 94%
- SimSearch: A Human-in-the-Loop Learning Framework for Fast Detection of Regions of Interest in Microscopy Images 94%
- Predicting the effort required to manually mend auto-segmentations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- SN-FPN: Self-attention Nested Feature Pyramid Network for Digital Pathology Image Segmentation 97%
- Cell segmentation without annotation by unsupervised domain adaptation based on cooperative self-learning 94%
- HeartNet: Self Multi-Head Attention Mechanism via Convolutional Network with Adversarial Data Synthesis for ECG-based Arrhythmia Classification 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effective Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting COVID-19 Outcomes from Chest Computed Tomography Volumes 96%
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 95%
- A novel interpretable deep transfer learning combining diverse learnable parameters for improved T2D prediction based on single-cell gene regulatory networks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.