Back

Image-based modelling of inhaler deposition during respiratory exacerbation

Williams, J.; Kolehmainen, J. T.; Cunningham, S.; Ozel, A.; Wolfram, U.

2020-06-09 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2020.06.08.20118513 medRxiv
Show abstract

For many of the one billion sufferers of respiratory diseases worldwide, managing their disease with inhalers improves their ability to breathe. Poor disease management and rising pollution can trigger exacerbations which require urgent relief. Higher drug deposition in the throat instead of the lungs limits the impact on patient symptoms. To optimise delivery to the lung, patient-specific computational studies of aerosol inhalation can be used. How-ever in many studies, inhalation modelling does not represent an exacerbation, where the patients breath is much faster and shorter. Here we compare differences in deposition of inhaler particles (10, 4 {micro}m) in the airways of a healthy male, female lung cancer and child cystic fibrosis patient. We aimed to evaluate deposition differences during an exacerbation compared to healthy breathing with image-based healthy and diseased patient models. We found that the ratio of drug in the lower to upper lobes was 35% larger during healthy breathing than an exacerbation. For smaller particles the upper airway deposition was similar in all patients, but local deposition hotspots differed in size, location and intensity. Our results identify that image-based airways must be used in respiratory modelling. Various inhalation profiles should be tested for optimal prediction of inhaler deposition. HighlightsO_LIRegional and local drug deposition was modelled in three patients during normal, sinusoidal inhalation and an exacerbation. C_LIO_LILocal drug deposition changes with airway shape and inhalation profile, even when regional deposition is similar. C_LIO_LIImage-based models were combined with highly-resolved particle tracking including particle contact and cohesion. C_LIO_LIFluid model validated by comparing gas velocity field with in vitro experiments. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.8%
2
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
5
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%