Back

Understanding pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) production conditions, stakeholders preferences for varietal traits and their implications for breeding programmes in India

Fromm, I.; Singh, A.; Venkatesh, P.; Tewari, H.; Padaria, R.; Egger, U.

2020-06-09 ecology
10.1101/2020.06.08.139832 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) is an important pulse crop in the Indian diet and one of the most important sources of dietary protein for the population. In the context of the fourth phase of the Indo-Swiss Collaboration in Biotechnology, an assessment how farmers and consumers perceive new pigeon pea cultivars and what are their preferred traits was conducted. This investigation assessed Indias food security implications due to stagnating and low yield of pigeon pea and ascertain farmers preferences of pigeon pea varietal traits, production constraints and farmers coping strategies in diverse pigeon pea production environments. Results indicated that production constraints in the studied regions were basically similar, with majority of the farmers identifying pod borer & pod fly as the major pest, and wilt as the major disease and drought as a major production constraint. Farmers indicated the use of clean seed, high yielding varieties, inter & mixed cropping, planting density, and manure application as some of the strategies they used to cope with the production constraints. In terms of preference for new cultivars, farmers want high grain yield with drought tolerance, medium to early maturity, pod borer resistance, tolerance to wilt disease, moderate plant height and ease of threshing without compromising other preferred attributes. The analysis of processors preference of grain types for dal processing showed that uniform size, oval shape, orange coloured seed and most importantly moderately hard seed coat are highly desirable. Consumers lacked awareness on the varieties, but considered traits like uniform seeds and reduced cooking time traits more desirable.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.