Back

SF3B1-targeted Splicing Inhibition Triggers Global Alterations in Transcriptional Dynamics and R-Loop Metabolism

Castillo Guzman, D.; Hartono, S. R.; Sanz, L. A.; Chedin, F.

2020-06-08 molecular biology Community evaluation
10.1101/2020.06.08.130583 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Efficient co-transcriptional splicing is thought to suppress genome-destabilizing R-loops. Inhibition of SF3B1, a core U2 spliceosome component, by Pladienolide B (PladB) in human K562 cells caused widespread intron retention and modest R-loops gains. Minimal overlap existed between these events, suggesting that unspliced introns by themselves do not cause excessive R-loops. R-loop gains were instead driven by extensive readthrough transcription at a subset of stress-response genes, defining a new class of aberrant "downstream of genes" (DoG) R-loops. Such DoG R-loops were temporally and spatially uncoupled from loci experiencing DNA damage. Unexpectedly, the predominant response to splicing inhibition was a global R-loop loss. This resulted from increased promoter-proximal pausing and defective transcription elongation associated with premature termination. Similar results were observed upon depletion of Aquarius, a U2 spliceosome-associated factor previously thought to suppress R-loops. Thus, U2 spliceosome-targeted splicing inhibition triggered profound alterations in transcriptional dynamics, leading to unexpected disruptions in R-loop landscapes. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIIntron retention caused by SF3B1 inhibition does not trigger excessive R-loops C_LIO_LIStress-response genes shows readthrough transcription and R-loop gains C_LIO_LIR-loop gains and DNA damage are temporally and spatially uncoupled C_LIO_LIU2 snRNP inhibition causes broad reduction in transcription and dominant R-loop loss C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.