Interplay of global multi-scale human mobility, social distancing, government interventions, and COVID-19 dynamics
Adiga, A.; Wang, L.; Sadilek, A.; Tendulkar, A.; Venkatramanan, S.; Vullikanti, A.; Aggarwal, G.; Talekar, A.; Ben, X.; Chen, J.; Lewis, B.; Swarup, S.; Tambe, M.; Marathe, M.
Show abstract
This work quantifies mobility changes observed during the different phases of the pandemic world-wide at multiple resolutions - county, state, country - using an anonymized aggregate mobility map that captures population flows between geographic cells of size 5 km2. As we overlay the global mobility map with epidemic incidence curves and dates of government interventions, we observe that as case counts rose, mobility fell and has since then seen a slow but steady increase in flows. Further, in order to understand mixing within a region, we propose a new metric to quantify the effect of social distancing on the basis of mobility.Taking two very different countries sampled from the global spectrum, We analyze in detail the mobility patterns of the United States (US) and India. We then carry out a counterfactual analysis of delaying the lockdown and show that a one week delay would have doubled the reported number of cases in the US and India. Finally, we quantify the effect of college students returning back to school for the fall semester on COVID-19 dynamics in the surrounding community. We employ the data from a recent university outbreak (reported on August 16, 2020) to infer possible Reff values and mobility flows combined with daily prevalence data and census data to obtain an estimate of new cases that might arrive on a college campus. We find that maintaining social distancing at existing levels would be effective in mitigating the extra seeding of cases. However, potential behavioral change and increased social interaction amongst students (30% increase in Reff) along with extra seeding can increase the number of cases by 20% over a period of one month in the encompassing county. To our knowledge, this work is the first to model in near real-time, the interplay of human mobility, epidemic dynamics and public policies across multiple spatial resolutions and at a global scale.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Forecasting hospital-level COVID-19 admissions using real-time mobility data 94%
- COVID-19 in Italy: targeted testing as a proxy of limited health care facilities and a key to reducing hospitalization rate and the death toll 93%
- Risk mapping novel respiratory pathogens with large-scale dynamic contact networks 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the effect of social inequalities in the mitigation of COVID-19 across communities in Santiago de Chile 95%
- Mobility-driven synthetic contact matrices: a scalable solution for real-time pandemic response modeling 93%
- The impact of contact tracing and household bubbles on deconfinement strategies for COVID-19: an individual-based modelling study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the representation of contact data on the evaluation of interventions in infectious diseases simulations 94%
- Socioeconomic determinants of mobility responses during the first wave of COVID-19 in Italy: from provinces to neighbourhoods 94%
- A novel, scenario-based approach to comparing non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies across nations 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.