Forward-looking serial intervals correctly link epidemic growth to reproduction numbers
Park, S. W.; Sun, K.; Champredon, D.; Li, M.; Bolker, B. M.; Earn, D. J. D.; Weitz, J. S.; Grenfell, B. T.; Dushoff, J.
Show abstract
Generation intervals and serial intervals are critical quantities for characterizing outbreak dynamics. Generation intervals characterize the time between infection and transmission, while serial intervals characterize the time between the onset of symptoms in a chain of transmission. They are often used interchangeably, leading to misunderstanding of how these intervals link the epidemic growth rate r and the reproduction number[R] . Generation intervals provide a mechanistic link between r and[R] but are harder to measure via contact tracing. While serial intervals are easier to measure from contact tracing, recent studies suggest that the two intervals give different estimates of[R] from r. We present a general framework for characterizing epidemiological delays based on cohorts (i.e., a group of individuals that share the same event time, such as symptom onset) and show that forward-looking serial intervals, which correctly link[R] with r, are not the same as "intrinsic" serial intervals, but instead change with r. We provide a heuristic method for addressing potential biases that can arise from not accounting for changes in serial intervals across cohorts and apply the method to estimating[R] for the COVID-19 outbreak in China using serial-interval data -- our analysis shows that using incorrectly defined serial intervals can severely bias estimates. This study demonstrates the importance of early epidemiological investigation through contact tracing and provides a rationale for reassessing generation intervals, serial intervals, and[R] estimates, for COVID-19. Significance StatementThe generation- and serial-interval distributions are key, but different, quantities in outbreak analyses. Recent theoretical studies suggest that two distributions give different estimates of the reproduction number[R] from the exponential growth rate r; however, both intervals, by definition, describe disease transmission at the individual level. Here, we show that the serial-interval distribution, defined from the correct reference time and cohort, gives the same estimate of[R] as the generation-interval distribution. We then apply our framework to serial-interval data from the COVID-19 outbreak in China. While our study supports the use of serial-interval distributions in estimating[R] , it also reveals necessary changes to the current understanding and applications of serial-interval distribution.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Roles of generation-interval distributions in shaping relative epidemic strength, speed, and control of new SARS-CoV-2 variants 98%
- A stochastic epidemiological model to estimate the size of an outbreak at the first case identification 97%
- Inferring generation-interval distributions from contact-tracing data 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Selection for infectivity profiles in slow and fast epidemics, and the rise of SARS-CoV-2 variants 96%
- A within-host infection model to explore tolerance andresistance 95%
- How microscopic epistasis and clonal interference shape the fitness trajectory in a spin glass model of microbial long-term evolution 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.