Back

Deep Learning and Holt-Trend Algorithms for predicting COVID-19 pandemic

Aldhyani, T. H. H.; Alrasheed, M.; Alqarn, A. i. A.; Alzahrani, M. Y.; Alahmadi, A. H. ,

2020-06-05 health informatics
10.1101/2020.06.03.20121590
Show abstract

According to WHO, more than one million individuals are infected with COVID-19, and around 20000 people have died because of this infectious disease around the world. In addition, COVID-19 epidemic poses serious public health threat to the world where people with little or no pre-existing human immunity can be more vulnerable to the effects of the effects of the coronavirus. Thus, developing surveillance systems for predicting COVID-19 pandemic in an early stage saves millions of lives. In this study, the deep learning algorithm and Holt-trend model is proposed to predict coronavirus. The Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) algorithm and Holt-trend were applied to predict confirmed numbers and death cases. The real time data have been collected from the World Health Organization (WHO). In the proposed research, we have considered three countries to test the proposed model namely Saudi Arabia, Spain and Italy. The results suggest that the LSTM models showed better performance in predicting the cases of coronavirus patients. Standard measure performance MSE, RMSE, Mean error and correlation are employed to estimate the results of the proposed models. The empirical results of the LSTM by using correlation metric are 99.94%, 99.94% and 99.91 to predict number of confirmed cases on COVID-19 in three countries. Regarding the prediction results of LSTM model to predict the number of death on COVID-19 are 99.86%, 98.876% and 99.16 with respect to the Saudi Arabia, Italy and Spain respectively. Similarly the experimented results of Holt-Trend to predict the number of confirmed cases on COVID-19 by using correlation metrics are 99.06%, 99.96% and 99.94, whereas the results of Holt-Trend to predict the number of death cases are 99.80%, 99.96 and 99.94 with respect to the Saudi Arabia, Italy and Spain respectively. The empirical results indicate the efficient performance of the presented model in predicting the number of confirmed and death cases of COVID-19 in these countries. Such findings provide better insights about the future of COVID-19 in general. The results were obtained by applying the time series models which needs to be considered for the sake of saving the lives of many people.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 13%
11.1%
2
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 63%
6.3%
4
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
based on 17 papers
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 0.7%
5.8%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 4%
4.6%
7
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
4.4%
8
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
JMIR Medical Informatics
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
4.4%
10
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 5%
2.9%
11
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
12
Patterns
based on 15 papers
Top 0.4%
2.8%
13
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 13%
2.4%
15
International Journal of Medical Informatics
based on 25 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
17
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
18
Biology Methods and Protocols
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 19%
1.2%
22
Sensors
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
23
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Applied Sciences
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
0.7%