Context-dependent functional compensation between Ythdf m6A readers
Lasman, L.; Krupalnik, V.; Geula, S.; Zerbib, M.; Viukov, S.; Mor, N.; Aguilera, A.; Mizrahi, O.; Shashank, S.; Nachshon, A.; Schneir, D.; Aigner, S.; Shankar, A.; Mueller, J.; Stern-Ginossar, N.; Yeo, G. W.; Novershtern, N.; Hanna, J. H.
Show abstract
The N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification is the most prevalent post-transcriptional mRNA modification, regulating mRNA decay, translation and splicing. It plays a major role during normal development, differentiation, and disease progression. The modification is dynamically regulated by a set of writer, eraser and reader proteins. The YTH-domain family of proteins: Ythdf1, Ythdf2, and Ythdf3, are three homologous m6A binding proteins, which have different cellular functions. However, their sequence similarity and their tendency to bind the same targets suggest that they may have overlapping roles. We systematically knocked out (KO) the Mettl3 writer for each of the Ythdf readers and for the three readers together (triple-KO). We then estimated the effect in-vivo, in mouse gametogenesis and viability, and in-vitro, in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). We show that in gametogenesis, Mettl3-KO severity is increased as the deletion occurs earlier in the process, and Ythdf2 has a dominant role that cannot be compensated by Ythdf1 or Ythdf3, possibly due to differences in readers expression, both in quantity and in spatial location. By knocking out the three readers together and systematically testing offspring genotypes, we have revealed a redundancy in the readers role during early development, a redundancy which is dosage-dependent. Additionally, we show that in mESCs there is compensation between the three readers, since the inability to differentiate and the significant effect on mRNA decay occur only in the triple-KO cells and not in the single KOs. Thus, we suggest a novel model for the Ythdf readers function. There is a dosage-dependent redundancy when all three readers are co-expressed in the same location in the cells.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergent dynamics of adult stem cell lineages from single nucleus and single cell RNA-Seq of Drosophila testes 96%
- The single-cell epigenetic regulatory landscape in mammalian perinatal testis development 96%
- Differentiating Drosophila female germ cells initiate Polycomb silencing by altering PRC2 sampling 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Klf5 establishes bi-potential cell fate by dual regulation of ICM and TE specification genes 96%
- Lineage-specific CDK activity dynamics characterize early mammalian development 96%
- YTHDC2 Is Essential for Pachytene Progression and Prevents Aberrant Microtubule-Driven Telomere Clustering in Male Meiosis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural perturbation of chromatin domains with multiple developmental regulators can severely impact gene regulation and development 96%
- Ribosomal RNA 2'-O-methylation dynamics impact cell fate decisions 96%
- Rapid and efficient adaptation of the dTAG system in mammalian development reveals stage specific requirements of NELF 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Destabilization of mRNAs enhances competence to initiate meiosis in mouse spermatogenic cells 97%
- MicroRNA-202 prevents precocious spermatogonial differentiation and meiotic initiation during mouse spermatogenesis 97%
- TBXT dose sensitivity and the decoupling of nascent mesoderm specification from EMT progression in 2D human gastruloids 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A temporally controlled sequence of X-chromosomeinactivation and reactivation defines female mouse in vitro germ cells with meiotic potential 96%
- Repression By Hdac3 And Dax1 Mediates Lineage Restriction Of Embryonic Stem Cells 96%
- A genetic program boosts mitochondrial function to power macrophage tissue invasion 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.