Optimizing the molecular diagnosis of Covid-19 by combining RT-PCR and a pseudo-convolutional machine learning approach to characterize virus DNA sequences
Gomes, J. C.; Masood, A. I.; Silva, L. H. d. S.; Ferreira, J.; F. Junior, A. A.; Rocha, A. L. d. S.; Castro, L.; da Silva, N. R. C.; Fernandes, B. J. T.; dos Santos, W. P.
Show abstract
The proliferation of the SARS-Cov-2 virus to the whole world caused more than 250,000 deaths worldwide and over 4 million confirmed cases. The severity of Covid-19, the exponential rate at which the virus proliferates, and the rapid exhaustion of the public health resources are critical factors. The RT-PCR with virus DNA identification is still the benchmark Covid-19 diagnosis method. In this work we propose a new technique for representing DNA sequences: they are divided into smaller sequences with overlap in a pseudo-convolutional approach, and represented by co-occurrence matrices. This technique analyzes the DNA sequences obtained by the RT-PCR method, eliminating sequence alignment. Through the proposed method, it is possible to identify virus sequences from a large database: 347,363 virus DNA sequences from 24 virus families and SARS-Cov-2. Experiments with all 24 virus families and SARS-Cov-2 (multi-class scenario) resulted 0.822222 {+/-} 0.05613 for sensitivity and 0.99974 {+/-} 0.00001 for specificity using Random Forests with 100 trees and 30% overlap. When we compared SARS-Cov-2 with similar-symptoms virus families, we got 0.97059 {+/-} 0.03387 for sensitivity, and 0.99187 {+/-} 0.00046 for specificity with MLP classifier and 30% overlap. In the real test scenario, in which SARS-Cov-2 is compared to Coronaviridae and healthy human DNA sequences, we got 0.98824 {+/-} 001198 for sensitivity and 0.99860 {+/-} 0.00020 for specificity with MLP and 50% overlap. Therefore, the molecular diagnosis of Covid-19 can be optimized by combining RT-PCR and our pseudo-convolutional method to identify SARS-Cov-2 DNA sequences faster with higher specificity and sensitivity.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial intelligence tool for the study of COVID-19 microdroplet spread across the human diameter and airborne space 96%
- A Machine Learning Model of Microscopic Agglutination Test for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis 96%
- Machine learning using intrinsic genomic signatures for rapid classification of novel pathogens: COVID-19 case study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enrichment analysis on regulatory subspaces: a novel direction for the superior description of cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 95%
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 94%
- A machine-learning Approach for Stress Detection Using Wearable Sensors in Free-living Environments 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting the Epidemic Curve of the Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Disease (COVID-19) Using Artificial Intelligence 95%
- EnGRNT: Inference of gene regulatory networks using ensemble methods and topological feature extraction 93%
- Extensive In Silico Analysis of the Functional and Structural Consequences of SNPs in Human ARX Gene 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Convolution Based Computational Approach Towards DNA N6-methyladenine Site Identification and Motif Extraction in Rice Genome 95%
- Comparing protein-protein interaction networks of SARS-CoV-2 and (H1N1) influenza using topological features 95%
- Estimation of Three-Dimensional Chromatin Morphology for Nuclear Classification and Characterisation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.