Back

Nationwide survey on the barriers to converting turfgrass lawns to pollinator-friendly native wildflowers.

Turley, N. E.; Hogan, J.; Diehl, G. J.; Stack, A. C.; Sharanowski, B. J.

2020-06-02 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2020.06.02.129452 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The abundance and diversity of insect pollinators around the world is declining and habitat loss is a leading cause. Turfgrass lawns cover a vast area in North America and provide a great opportunity for habitat restoration to native wildflowers by the general public. Efforts to encourage the public to replace lawns with wildflowers could be improved by a better understanding of the thoughts and opinions of the public about lawns. We conducted a nationwide online survey to understand what barriers are most important in preventing people from converting a 6 x 6 ft portion of turfgrass lawn to native wildflowers. We also collected data on a variety of demographic factors to see if those influence survey responses. Over 3200 people took survey across the US. We found that ‘Maintenance time’ and ‘Not knowing what to do’ were the most important barriers to creating wildflower habitat. Age was the most important demographic factor impacting results with young people significantly more likely to select multiple barriers in the survey. For example, people aged 18-34 were 4.3 times more likely to indicate ‘Maintenance cost’ would prevent them from creating a wildflower plot than those age 65 or older. Those who had already created a wildflower plot, or those who were members in a native plant or pollinator organization were less likely to select barriers across the board, except for external barriers related to homeowners associations, neighbors, and local governments. This shows that these are persistent concerns even for those that are otherwise keen to create wildflower habitat. Our results suggest that outreach promoting pollinator-friendly native plant gardens should focus on clear and simple methods, small plots that will not take too much time and less likely to provoke neighbors or authority figures.View Full Text

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
20.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
4
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
8
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
9
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
13
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
14
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
15
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
22
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%