Back

Paleoclimate and current climate collectively shape the phylogenetic and functional diversity of trees worldwide

Guo, W.-Y.; Serra-Diaz, J. M.; Schrodt, F.; Eiserhardt, W. L.; Maitner, B. S.; Merow, C.; Violle, C.; Blach-Overgaard, A.; Zhang, J.; Anand, M.; Belluau, M.; Bruun, H. H.; Byun, C.; Catford, J. A.; Cerabolini, B. E. L.; Chacón-Madrigal, E.; Ciccarelli, D.; Cornelissen, J. H. C.; Dang-Le, A. T.; de Frutos, A.; Dias, A. S.; Giroldo, A. B.; Hattingh, W.; He, T.; Hietz, P.; Hough-Snee, N.; Jansen, S.; Kattge, J.; klein, t.; Komac, B.; Kraft, N.; Kramer, K.; Lavorel, S.; Lusk, C. H.; Martin, A. R.; Mencuccini, M.; Michaletz, S. T.; Minden, V.; Mori, A. S.; Niinemets, Ülo; Onoda, Y.; Onste

2020-06-03 ecology
10.1101/2020.06.02.128975 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Trees are of vital importance for ecosystem functioning and services at local to global scales, yet we still lack a detailed overview of the global patterns of tree diversity and the underlying drivers, particularly the imprint of paleoclimate. Here, we present the high-resolution (110 km) worldwide mapping of tree species richness, functional and phylogenetic diversities based on [~]7 million quality-assessed occurrences for 46,752 tree species (80.5% of the estimated total number of tree species), and subsequent assessments of the influence of paleo-climate legacies on these patterns. All three tree diversity dimensions exhibited the expected latitudinal decline. Contemporary climate emerged as the strongest driver of all diversity patterns, with Pleistocene and deeper-time (>107 years) paleoclimate as important co-determinants, and, notably, with past cold and drought stress being linked to reduced current diversity. These findings demonstrate that tree diversity is affected by paleoclimate millions of years back in time and highlight the potential for tree diversity losses from future climate change.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.