Leveraging non-structural data to predict structures of protein-ligand complexes
Paggi, J. M.; Belk, J. A.; Hollingsworth, S. A.; Villanueva, N.; Powers, A. S.; Clark, M. J.; Chemparathy, A. G.; Tynan, J. E.; Lau, T. K.; Sunahara, R. K.; Dror, R. O.
Show abstract
Over the past fifty years, tremendous effort has been devoted to computational methods for predicting properties of ligands that bind macromolecular targets, a problem critical to rational drug design. Such methods generally fall into two categories: physics-based methods, which directly model ligand interactions with the target given the targets three-dimensional (3D) structure, and ligand-based methods, which predict ligand properties given experimental measurements for similar ligands. Here we present a rigorous statistical framework to combine these two sources of information. We develop a method to predict a ligands pose--the 3D structure of the ligand bound to its protein target--that leverages a widely available source of information: a list of other ligands that are known to bind the same target but for which no 3D structure is available. This combination of physics-based and ligand-based modeling improves upon state-of-the-art pose prediction accuracy across all major families of drug targets. As an illustrative application, we predict binding poses of antipsychotics and validate the results experimentally. Our statistical framework and results suggest broad opportunities to predict diverse ligand properties using machine learning methods that draw on physical modeling and ligand data simultaneously.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of ligand-specific G-protein coupled receptor states and prediction of downstream efficacy via data-driven modeling 93%
- Deep Learning Reveals Endogenous Sterols as Allosteric Modulators of the GPCR-Gα Interface 93%
- Reliable protein-protein docking with AlphaFold, Rosetta and replica-exchange 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.