Back

Implementation of Genomic Variant Calling: A Novel Approach

Kumar, A.; Bangash, A. H.

2020-06-01 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.05.31.126144 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genomics has emerged as one of the major sources of big data. The task of augmenting data-driven challenges into bioinformatics can be met using technologies of parallel and distributed computing. GATK4 tools for genomic variants detection are enabled for high-performance computing platforms - SPARK Map Reduce framework. GATK4+WDL+CROMWELL+SPARK+DOCKER is proposed as the way forward in achieving automation, reproducibility, reusability, customization, portability and scalability. SPARK-based tools perform equally well in genomic variants detection with that of standard implementation of GATK4 tools over a command-line interface. Implementation of workflows over cloud-based high-performance computing platforms will enhance usability and will be a way forward in community research and infrastructure development for genomic variant discovery.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.7%
Similar papers in this journal
4
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.5%
7
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
9
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Gigabyte
● 62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Journal of Open Source Software
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Database
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Nature Protocols
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.1%
20
STAR Protocols
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
22
SoftwareX
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
● 38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Genes
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Methods
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
28
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.