Back

A generalized SEIRD model with implicit social distancing mechanism: a Bayesian approach for the identification of the spread of COVID-19 with applications in Brazil and Rio de Janeiro state

Volpatto, D. T.; Resende, A. C. M.; Anjos, L.; Silva, J. V. O.; Dias, C. M.; Almeida, R. C.; Malta, S. M. C.

2020-10-12 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.05.30.20117283 medRxiv
Show abstract

Brazils continental dimension poses a challenge to the control of the spread of COVID-19. Due to the country specific scenario of high social and demographic heterogeneity, combined with limited testing capacity, lack of reliable data, under-reporting of cases, and restricted testing policy, the focus of this study is twofold: (i) to develop a generalized SEIRD model that implicitly takes into account the quarantine measures, and (ii) to estimate the response of the COVID-19 spread dynamics to perturbations/uncertainties. By investigating the projections of cumulative numbers of confirmed and death cases, as well as the effective reproduction number, we show that the model parameter related to social distancing measures is one of the most influential along all stages of the disease spread and the most influential after the infection peak. Due to such importance in the outcomes, different relaxation strategies of social distancing measures are investigated in order to determine which strategies are viable and less hazardous to the population. The results highlight the need of keeping social distancing policies to control the disease spread. Specifically, the considered scenario of abrupt social distancing relaxation implemented after the occurrence of the peak of positively diagnosed cases can prolong the epidemic, with a significant increase of the projected numbers of confirmed and death cases. An even worse scenario could occur if the quarantine relaxation policy is implemented before evidence of the epidemiological control, indicating the importance of the proper choice of when to start relaxing social distancing measures.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
5
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
9
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
23
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
25
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%