Back

Risk factors of coronary microvascular obstruction

Li, Y.; Lyu, S.

2020-06-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.05.29.20116665 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCoronary microvascular obstruction /no-reflow(CMVO/NR) is a predictor of long-term mortality in survivors of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). ObjectiveTo identify risk factors of CMVO/NR. MethodsTotally 2384 STEMI patients treated with PPCI were divided into two groups according to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI) flow grade:CMVO/NR group(246cases, TIMI 0-2 grade) and control group(2138 cases, TIMI 3 grade). We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors of CMVO/NR. ResultsA frequency of CMVO/NR was 10.3%(246/2384). Logistic regression analysis showed that the differences between the two groups in age(unadjusted odds ratios [OR] 1.032; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.045; adjusted OR 1.032; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.046; P <0.001), periprocedural bradycardia (unadjusted OR 2.357; 95% CI, 1.752 to 3.171; adjusted OR1.818; 95% CI, 1.338 to 2.471; P <0.001),using thrombus aspirationdevices during operation (unadjusted OR 2.489; 95% CI, 1.815 to 3.414; adjusted OR1.835; 95% CI, 1.291 to 2.606; P =0.001), neutrophil percentage (unadjusted OR 1.028; 95% CI, 1.014 to 1.042; adjusted OR1.022; 95% CI, 1.008 to 1.036; P =0.002), and completely block of culprit vessel (unadjusted OR 2.626; 95% CI, 1.85 to 3.728; adjusted-OR 1.656;95% CI, 1.119 to 2.45; P =0.012) were statistically significant (P <0. 05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.6896. ConclusionsAge, periprocedural bradycardia, using thrombus aspirationdevices during operation, neutrophil percentage, and completely block of culprit vessel may be independent risk factors for predicting CMVO/NR. We registered this study with WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (registration number: ChiCTR1900023213; registered date: 16 May 2019).http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=39057&htm=4.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
3
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.4%
5
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
8
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
11
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
13
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
18
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
European Journal of Pharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%