Back

Two new immature and dysfunctional neutrophil cell subsets define a predictive signature of sepsis useable in clinical practice

Meghraoui-Kheddar, A.; Chousterman, B. G.; Guillou, N.; Barone, S. M.; Granjeaud, S.; Vallet, H.; Corneau, A.; Guessous, K.; Boissonnas, A.; Irish, J. M.; Combadiere, C.

2020-05-31 immunology
10.1101/2020.05.29.123992 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sepsis is the leading cause of death in adult intensive care units. At present, sepsis diagnosis relies on non-specific clinical features. It could transform clinical care to have objective immune cell biomarkers that could predict sepsis diagnosis and guide treatment. For decades, neutrophil phenotypes have been studied in sepsis, but a diagnostic cell subset has yet to be identified. Here, high dimensional mass cytometry was used to reveal for the first time a specific neutrophil signature of sepsis severity that does not overlap with other inflammatory biomarkers, and that distinguishes patients with sepsis from those with non-infectious inflammatory syndrome. Unsupervised analysis of 42-dimesional mass cytometry data characterized previously unappreciated heterogeneity within the CD64+ immature neutrophils and revealed two new subsets distinguished by CD123 and PD-L1 expression. These immature neutrophils exhibited diminished activation and phagocytosis functions. The proportion of CD123-expressing neutrophils also correlated with clinical severity. Critically, this study showed that these two new neutrophil subsets were specific to sepsis and detectable by routine flow cytometry using seven markers. The demonstration here that a simple blood test distinguishes sepsis from other inflammatory conditions represents a key biological milestone that can be immediately translated into improvements in patient care. One Sentence SummaryCD123+ and/or PD-L1+ immature and dysfunctional neutrophil subsets identified by mass cytometry, define an early human blood signature of sepsis

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.1%
2
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 24%
5.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.3%
5
International Immunopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
6
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
8
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
9
Cytometry Part A
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
11
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
12
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
14
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%
16
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
18
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
19
Infection and Immunity
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
21
European Journal of Immunology
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
23
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
24
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
27
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
28
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%