Back

Population studies in the wild tomato species Solanum chilense reveal maintenance and loss of resistance at geographically distinct locations

Kahlon, P. S.; Seta, S. M.; Zander, G.; Scheikl, D.; Joosten, M. H. A. J.; Huckelhoven, R.; Stam, R.

2020-05-31 ecology
10.1101/2020.05.29.122960 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Natural plant populations encounter strong pathogen pressure and defense-associated genes are known to be under different selection pressure dependent on the pressure by the pathogens. Here we use wild tomato Solanum chilense populations to investigate natural resistance against Cladosporium fulvum, a well-known pathogenic fungus of domesticated tomatoes. We show that populations of S. chilense differ in resistance against the pathogen. Next, we explored the underlying molecular processes in a species wide-context. Then, focusing on recognition of the two prominent avirulence factors secreted by C. fulvum (Avr4 and Avr9) in central and northern populations of S. chilense we observed high complexity in the cognate homologues of Cladosporium resistance (Hcr9) locus underlying the recognition of these effectors. Presence of canonical genomic regions coding for Cf-4 and Cf-9, two major dominant resistance genes in the Hcr9 locus recognizing Avr4 and Avr9, respectively, does not meet prediction from Avr response phenotypes. We find both genes in varying fractions of the plant populations and we show possible co-existence of two functionally active resistance genes, previously thought to be allelic. Additionally, we observed the complete local absence of recognition of additional Avr proteins of C. fulvum. In the southern populations we attribute this to changes in the coregulatory network. As a result of loss of pathogen pressure or adaptation to extreme climatic conditions. This may ultimately explain the observed pathogen susceptibility in the southern populations. This work puts major gene mediated disease resistance in an ecological context.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.