Back

Phenotypic and molecular characterization of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from various samples of animal origin from Assam, India

Das, L.; Borah, P.; Sharma, R.; Malakar, D.; Saikia, G. K.; Sharma, K.; Tamuly, S.; Dutta, R.

2020-05-30 molecular biology
10.1101/2020.05.28.122705 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae has become a major threat globally. Here we have characterized ESBL producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae from various sources, studied antibiogram and resistance gene profiles. Out of 385 samples, 31 (8.05%) were positive for ESBL producing E. coli. Such isolates could be recovered from 10.05, 8.33, 15.63, 6.67 and 4.35 per cent of cattle milk, curd, chicken, pork and cattle faeces samples, respectively. A total of 59 (15.32%) samples were positive for ESBL producing K. pneumoniae, which were isolated from 14.35, 6.25, 21.43 and 34.78 per cent cattle milk, chicken, beef and cattle faeces, respectively. All the 90 isolates were confirmed as ESBL producers by CDT and ESBL-E strip tests. Antibiogram revealed that 74.19% and 69.49% of the ESBL producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, respectively showed resistance to ceftizoxime, 25.81% and 23.73% to both co-trimoxazole and tetracycline, 19.35% and 25.42% to ciprofloxacin, 9.68% and 16.95% to chloramphenicol, 3.23% and 5.08% to pipercillin-tazobactam, and 3.23% and 3.39% to gentamicin. Resistance gene profiling showed blaCTX-M gene as most predominant (100%). The blaTEM gene was found in 54.84% and 55.93%, blaSHV gene in 90.32% and 77.97%, Sul 1 gene in 90.32% and 86.44% of ESBL producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, respectively. The Int1 gene was detected in 70.97% and 62.71% isolates, while qnrB gene was found in 3.23% and 10.17% of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, respectively.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.