Back

Representational Connectivity Analysis: Identifying Networks of Shared Changes in Representational Strength through Jackknife Resampling

Coutanche, M. N.; Buckser, R. R.; Akpan, E.

2020-05-30 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.05.28.103077 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The structure of information in the brain is crucial to cognitive function. The representational space of a brain region can be identified through Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. In its classic form, RSA collapses the time-series of each condition, eliminating fluctuations in similarity over time. We propose a method for identifying representational connectivity (RC) networks, which share fluctuations in representational strength, in an analogous manner to functional connectivity (FC), which tracks fluctuations in BOLD signal, and informational connectivity, which tracks fluctuations in pattern discriminability. We utilize jackknife resampling, a statistical technique in which observations are removed in turn to determine their influence. We applied the jackknife technique to an existing fMRI dataset collected as participants viewed videos of animals (Nastase et al., 2017). We used ventral temporal cortex (VT) as a seed region, and compared the resulting network to a second-order RSA, in which brain regions representational spaces are compared, and to the network identified through FC. The novel representational connectivity analysis identified a network comprising regions associated with lower-level visual processing, spatial cognition, perceptual-motor integration, and visual attention, indicating that these regions shared fluctuations in representational similarity strength with VT. RC, second-order RSA and FC identified areas unique to each method, indicating that analyzing shared fluctuations in the strength of representational similarity reveals previously undetectable networks of regions. The RC analysis thus offers a new way to understand representational similarity at the network level.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.