Back

A reductive analysis of a compartmental model for COVID-19: data assimilation andforecasting for the United Kingdom

Ananthakrishna, G.; Kumar, J.

2020-05-29 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.05.27.20114868 medRxiv
Show abstract

We introduce a deterministic model that partitions the total population into the susceptible, infected, quarantined, and those traced after exposure, the recovered and the deceased. We hypothesize accessible population for transmission of the disease to be a small fraction of the total population, for instance when interventions are in force. This hypothesis, together with the structure of the set of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations for the populations, allows us to decouple the equations into just two equations. This further reduces to a logistic type of equation for the total infected population. The equation can be solved analytically and therefore allows for a clear interpretation of the growth and inhibiting factors in terms of the parameters in the full model. The validity of the accessible population hypothesis and the efficacy of the reduced logistic model is demonstrated by the ease of fitting the United Kingdom data for the cumulative infected and daily new infected cases. The model can also be used to forecast further progression of the disease. In an effort to find optimized parameter values compatible with the United Kingdom coronavirus data, we first determine the relative importance of the various transition rates participating in the original model. Using this we show that the original model equations provide a very good fit with the United Kingdom data for the cumulative number of infections and the daily new cases. The fact that the model calculated daily new cases exhibits a turning point, suggests the beginning of a slow-down in the spread of infections. However, since the rate of slowing down beyond the turning point is small, the cumulative number of infections is likely to saturate to about 3.52 x 105 around late July, provided the lock-down conditions continue to prevail. Noting that the fit obtained from the reduced logistic equation is comparable to that with the full model equations, the underlying causes for the limited forecasting ability of the reduced logistic equation are elucidated. The model and the procedure adopted here are expected to be useful in fitting the data for other countries and in forecasting the progression of the disease.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
2
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
6
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
20
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
27
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%