Back

A chest radiography-based artificial intelligence deep-learning model to predict severe Covid-19 patient outcomes: the CAPE (Covid-19 AI Predictive Engine) Model

Liew, C.; Quah, J.; Goh, H. L.; Venkataraman, N.

2020-05-27 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.05.25.20113084 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChest radiography may be used together with deep-learning models to prognosticate COVID-19 patient outcomes PurposeT o evaluate the performance of a deep-learning model for the prediction of severe patient outcomes from COVID-19 pneumonia on chest radiographs. MethodsA deep-learning model (CAPE: Covid-19 AI Predictive Engine) was trained on 2337 CXR images including 2103 used only for validation while training. The prospective test set consisted of CXR images (n=70) obtained from RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia patients between 1 January and 30 April 2020 in a single center. The radiographs were analyzed by the AI model. Model performance was obtained by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. ResultsIn the prospective test set, the mean age of the patients was 46 (+/-16.2) years (84.2% male). The deep-learning model accurately predicted outcomes of ICU admission/mortality from COVID-19 pneumonia with an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.79-0.96). Compared to traditional risk scoring systems for pneumonia based upon laboratory and clinical parameters, the model matched the EWS and MulBTSA risk scoring systems and outperformed CURB-65. ConclusionsA deep-learning model was able to predict severe patient outcomes (ICU admission and mortality) from COVID-19 on chest radiographs. Key ResultsA deep-learning model was able to predict severe patient outcomes (ICU admission and mortality) from COVID-19 from chest radiographs with an AUC of 0.79, which is comparable to traditional risk scoring systems for pneumonia. Summary StatementThis is a chest radiography-based AI model to prognosticate the risk of severe COVID-19 pneumonia outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.